[dini-ag-kim-lizenzen] Fwd: Re: [dcmi/usage] Literal value for dct:rights (#30)

[Stefanie Rühle]

Hallo zusammen,

der folgende Vorschlag für eine Änderung der range für dcterms:rights 
ging gerade über die dcmi Usage Board Liste.

Gruß

    Stefanie



-------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: 	Re: [dcmi/usage] Literal value for dct:rights (#30)
Datum: 	Tue, 3 Jul 2018 05:28:57 -0700
Von: 	tombaker <notifications at github.com>
Antwort an: 	dcmi/usage 
<reply+0050685fbc8763098882ff883cc3ba458c2b6b44d7f2a65192cf0000000117532e0992a169ce13999409 at reply.github.com> 

An: 	dcmi/usage <usage at noreply.github.com>
Kopie (CC): 	Subscribed <subscribed at noreply.github.com>



I almost upvoted this, but agree that it would be good to recommend 
vocabularies. A bit more concise, adding references to Creative Commons 
and RightsStatements.org:

|Recommended practice is to refer to a rights statement with a URI, 
preferably from a formal rights statements vocabulary such as those 
defined by Creative Commons [CC] or RightsStatements.org [RIGHTS]. When 
no such URI is available, it is acceptable to refer to the rights 
statement with a literal denoting such a statement or with the full text 
of the statement. |

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub 
<https://github.com/dcmi/usage/issues/30#issuecomment-402138560>, or 
mute the thread 
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFBoX2ds9Vcy3q124NTyWlgunHDOdjlIks5uC2OJgaJpZM4UYGQX>.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.dnb.de/pipermail/dini-ag-kim-lizenzen/attachments/20180703/3ae7e420/attachment.html>