Antw: [Dini-ag-kim-bestandsdaten] Discussion at GitHub and movingwall

[Jörg Prante]

Hi Carsten,

only a quick reply. There is the W3C Time Ontology

http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/

so that assertions like

mwo:time "-P2Y"^^^xsd:duration

can better be expressed as time intervals of the W3C Time Ontology with
semantics, such as

@prefix time: <http://www.w3.org/2006/time#> .

:movingWallTheLast2Years a owl:Class;
       rdf:subClassOf time:Interval;
       owl:subClassOf [
           a owl:Restriction;
           owl:cardinality 1;
           owl:hasValue "-P2Y"^^xsd:yearMonthDuration
           owl:onProperty time:durationDescriptionDataType
       ]
] .

Take care of xsd:duration, it is problematic to use it in RDF, see the
note at http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-xsch-datatypes/ (4. Duration)

Also it would be nice to align moving walls (and other durations) with
CIDOC-CRM, and Dublin Core dcterms sizeOrDuration.

There is a class http://www.cidoc-crm.org/rdfs/cidoc-crm#E52_Time-Span
which can also serve as a class of life time spans for remote-accessed
items, i.e. restrictions in contracts with publishers that suppress
online library services for a certain time span.

Best,

Jörg


>>> "Klee, Carsten" <Carsten.Klee at sbb.spk-berlin.de> schrieb am
22.07.2013 um 15.19
Uhr in Nachricht
<F92C45C191C9FB4281F352EB52DFA7AD08585253 at PMXMDB02.pk.de>:
> Dear list members!
> 
> I just want to remind you that we moved the main development of the
holdings 
> ontology to GitHub [1]. There is a current discussion about the
relation 
> between items and location [2]. We strongly need your input!
> 
> It appears that if one makes a comment to an issue, she did not get a

> notification by mail, but only on comments by others. I haven't found
a way 
> yet to automatically forward all comments on issues to the list. So
the 
> discussion on GitHub is somehow isolated from the list. Sorry for
that! 
> 
> Second, I created a draft for a new micro-ontology "Moving Wall
Ontology 
> (MWO)" [3][4]. MWO extends DSO [5] with information about the
retention of 
> items. But I don't know if this is appropriate. Maybe Jakob has an
objection 
> to this.
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> Carsten
> 
> [1] <https://github.com/dini-ag-kim/holding-ontology>
> [2] <https://github.com/dini-ag-kim/holding-ontology/issues/2>
> [3] <http://cklee.github.io/movingwall/movingwall.html>
> [4] <https://github.com/cKlee/movingwall>
> [5] <http://purl.org/ontology/dso>
> _______________________________________________
> Carsten Klee
> Abt. Überregionale Bibliographische Dienste IIE
> Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz
> Potsdamer Straße 33
> 10785 Berlin
> 
> Fon:  +49 30 266-43 44 02
> Fax:   +49 30 266-33 40 01
> carsten.klee at sbb.spk-berlin.de
> www.zeitschriftendatenbank.de
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dini-ag-kim-bestandsdaten mailing list
> Dini-ag-kim-bestandsdaten at lists.d-nb.de
> http://lists.d-nb.de/mailman/listinfo/dini-ag-kim-bestandsdaten




-- 
Jörg Prante
hbz, Gruppe Portale
- Digitale Bibliothek und Online-Fernleihe -
Postfach 270451, 50510 Köln, Deutschland
Telefon +49-221-40075-156, Fax +49-221-40075-190
prante at hbz-nrw.de
http://www.hbz-nrw.de