[Metafacture] Metafacture "Get Together" - swib 2015?
christoph at hbz-nrw.de
Thu Nov 5 17:38:01 CET 2015
it's official - we will have a metafacture preconference!
We will try to skype this so that metafacture users/developers not able to be
physically at the SWIB can join in.
Spread the word.
C/hear you at 2015-11-23,
Mail me your skype contact then.
Christoph, Pascal wrote on 15.10.2015 15:50 :
> G¨¹nter, all,
> G¨¹nter Hipler wrote on 02.10.2015 08:38 :
>> Dear Metafactures,
>> As part of our linked.swissbib.ch project:
>> - We are now using Metamorph since the beginning of this year for
>> transformations of traditional library content into RDF Format. 
>> - We are trying to build workflows based on Metafacture where content is
>> transformed, enriched and serialized for access e.g via REST in
>> - For enrichment against VIAF and DBPedia at the moment we are using
>> Limes  based on Virtuoso Sparql instances
>> Most of the work is similar to projects running at DNB, HBZ and SLUB
>> (D:swarm) - which is still an important source of inspiration for us.
>> During the last weeks quite a lot of pull requests were being done on
>> GitHub . So people are busy with similar things we are doing but at
>> least from my perspective there is no communication and collaboration
>> between us. I always asked myself why we couldn't do better?
>> For the upcoming swib conference there is no workshop on the topic of
>> Metafacture as it was done in the last years. So my request and question:
>> Could we come together in Hamburg (I guess beside the official schedule)
>> during the SWIB conference? Topics could be:
> We could meet at the "DAY 1 2015-11-23 PRECONFERENCE" somewhere between 9:00 am
> and 12:00 am.
> We would have a room and WIFI.
> I would not advice to meet during the conference's day 2 and 3, as I would not
> like to miss speeches. Though it's possible, of course.
>> - How are we using Metafacture?
>> - What are the enhancements we have done and why?
>> - What is not possible with Metafacture/Metamorph and why and what
>> could/should be done? We ourself have still quite some "black holes"
>> and we would be happy to discuss them with others.
> I think these are interesting points and would like to discuss them!
>> If Hamburg is not possible - or maybe a first step- , could we organize
>> an exchange in some other/additional way?
>> Thanks for any kind of feedback!
>>  http://aksw.org/Projects/LIMES.html
>>  https://github.com/culturegraph/metafacture-core/pulls
> Metafacture mailing list
> Metafacture at lists.dnb.de
More information about the Metafacture