[gnd-ontology] AW: [BIBFRAME] Updated GND dump available with links to DBpedia, Wikipedia and STW

[Hauser, Julia]

Thank you for your interest!

>Why the difference, and where are these formats documented?

Please visit the GND ontology-website [1]. I also forward your question to the GND-ontology-mailinglist [2] to get more information.

>Apart from these, there exists the GND-MARC format. The download would be a lot
>more compact in MARC. Why not use this for downloading, or provide it as an
>alternative?

Of course, the GND is also available in other formats. You can find further information about other ways of access at [3] and [4]. Or just contact datendienste at dnb.de.

Kind regards,
Julia Hauser


[1] http://d-nb.info/standards/elementset/gnd#
[2] gnd-ontology at lists.d-nb.de 
[3] http://www.dnb.de/EN/Service/DigitaleDienste/Datendienst/datendienst_node.html 
[4] https://portal.dnb.de/metadataShop.htm (in German)

>
>Apart from these, there exists the GND-MARC format. The download would be a lot
>more compact in MARC. Why not use this for downloading, or provide it as an
>alternative?
>
>B.Eversberg 

***Lesen. Hören. Wissen. Deutsche Nationalbibliothek***
-- 
Julia Hauser 
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek 
Informationstechnik 
Adickesallee 1 
D-60322 Frankfurt am Main 
Telefon: +49-69-1525-1784 
Telefax: +49-69-1525-1799 
mailto:j.hauser at dnb.de 
http://www.dnb.de 



>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum
>[mailto:BIBFRAME at LISTSERV.LOC.GOV] Im Auftrag von Bernhard Eversberg
>Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. April 2013 13:47
>An: BIBFRAME at LISTSERV.LOC.GOV
>Betreff: Re: [BIBFRAME] Updated GND dump available with links to DBpedia,
>Wikipedia and STW
>
>24.04.2013 12:04, Hauser, Julia:
>
>> An updated RDF dump of the Integrated Authority File (GND) [1] is
>> available for download [2]. It includes links to the German Wikipedia,
>> DBpedia and also 1:1-relations to the STW Thesaurus for Economics [3].
>> The data are also available via http, SRU and OAI.
>> Further information about the Linked Data Service of the German
>> National Library (DNB) can be found on our website [4].
>> Best regards,
>> Julia Hauser
>> [1] _www.dnb.de/EN/gnd_ <http://www.dnb.de/EN/gnd> [2]
>> _http://datendienst.dnb.de/cgi-bin/mabit.pl?userID=opendata&pass=opend
>> ata&cmd=login_
>>
>
>Great. But:
>
>In the previous version (Oct. 2012), a record looked like this:
>(unpacked file:  8.5 GB)
>
><http://d-nb.info/gnd/4099395-4>
>       a       gnd:Work ;
>       gnd:firstAuthor <http://d-nb.info/gnd/118628852> ;
>       gnd:geographicAreaCode
>
><http://d-nb.info/standards/vocab/gnd/geographic-area-code#XA-DE> ;
>       gnd:gndIdentifier "4099395-4" ;
>       gnd:gndSubjectCategory
>               <http://d-nb.info/vocab/gnd-sc#12.2p> ;
>       gnd:languageCode <http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/iso639-2/ger> ;
>       gnd:oldAuthorityNumber
>               "(DE-588c)4099395-4" ;
>       gnd:preferredNameForTheWork
>               "Der @Sturz" .
>
>In the new version, the same record looks like this:
>(unpacked file:  5.9 GB)
>	<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://d-nb.info/gnd/4099395-4">
>		<gnd:gndIdentifier>4099395-4</gnd:gndIdentifier>
>		<gnd:oldAuthorityNumber>(DE-588c)4099395-
>4</gnd:oldAuthorityNumber>
>		<gnd:preferredNameForTheWork>Der
>Sturz</gnd:preferredNameForTheWork>
>		<gnd:firstAuthor rdf:resource="http://d-nb.info/gnd/118628852" />
>		<gnd:gndSubjectCategory
>rdf:resource="http://d-nb.info/vocab/gnd-sc#12.2p" />
>		<gnd:geographicAreaCode
>rdf:resource="http://d-nb.info/standards/vocab/gnd/geographic-area-code#XA-DE"
>/>
>		<gnd:languageCode
>rdf:resource="http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/iso639-2/ger" />
>		<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://d-
>nb.info/standards/elementset/gnd#Work" />
>	</rdf:Description>
>
>Why the difference, and where are these formats documented?
>(One little but annoying difference is the presence/absence of the non-filing
>indicator in the title field.)
>
>Apart from these, there exists the GND-MARC format. The download would be a lot
>more compact in MARC. Why not use this for downloading, or provide it as an
>alternative?
>
>B.Eversberg