[dini-ag-kim-lizenzen] Fwd: Re: [dcmi/usage] Literal value for dct:rights (#30)
Stefanie Rühle
sruehle at sub.uni-goettingen.de
Tue Jul 3 14:47:15 CEST 2018
Hallo zusammen,
der folgende Vorschlag für eine Änderung der range für dcterms:rights
ging gerade über die dcmi Usage Board Liste.
Gruß
Stefanie
-------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: [dcmi/usage] Literal value for dct:rights (#30)
Datum: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 05:28:57 -0700
Von: tombaker <notifications at github.com>
Antwort an: dcmi/usage
<reply+0050685fbc8763098882ff883cc3ba458c2b6b44d7f2a65192cf0000000117532e0992a169ce13999409 at reply.github.com>
An: dcmi/usage <usage at noreply.github.com>
Kopie (CC): Subscribed <subscribed at noreply.github.com>
I almost upvoted this, but agree that it would be good to recommend
vocabularies. A bit more concise, adding references to Creative Commons
and RightsStatements.org:
|Recommended practice is to refer to a rights statement with a URI,
preferably from a formal rights statements vocabulary such as those
defined by Creative Commons [CC] or RightsStatements.org [RIGHTS]. When
no such URI is available, it is acceptable to refer to the rights
statement with a literal denoting such a statement or with the full text
of the statement. |
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<https://github.com/dcmi/usage/issues/30#issuecomment-402138560>, or
mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFBoX2ds9Vcy3q124NTyWlgunHDOdjlIks5uC2OJgaJpZM4UYGQX>.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.dnb.de/pipermail/dini-ag-kim-lizenzen/attachments/20180703/3ae7e420/attachment.html>
More information about the dini-ag-kim-lizenzen
mailing list